<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kalamazoo River Archives - Dawda PLC</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dawdalaw.com/tag/kalamazoo-river/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dawdalaw.com/tag/kalamazoo-river/</link>
	<description>Leading Business Law Firm in Metro Detroit</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 22:38:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>The United States of Energy (Part 2): Concerns in Michigan and the Great Lakes</title>
		<link>https://www.dawdalaw.com/the-united-states-of-energy-part-2-concerns-in-michigan-and-the-great-lakes/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2020 13:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dilbit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enbridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Encana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kalamazoo River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MDEQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan Department of Environmental Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water withdrawal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dawdamann.com/?p=5048</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In a prior post we highlighted the recent energy boom in the U.S. Like elsewhere, the increased attention to energy production has been felt here in Michigan but on a smaller scale. Earlier in 2013, Encana (a Canadian company) announced that it was considering developing at least 500 new wells in the state. Current economics,  [...]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.dawdalaw.com/the-united-states-of-energy-part-2-concerns-in-michigan-and-the-great-lakes/">The United States of Energy (Part 2): Concerns in Michigan and the Great Lakes</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.dawdalaw.com">Dawda PLC</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" class="alignleft" src="https://www.dawdalaw.com/enviroblog/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2013/12/bigstock-Lake-Michigan-Beach-And-Dune-G-3839520-160x115.jpg" /><br />
In a prior post we highlighted the recent energy boom in the U.S. Like elsewhere, the increased attention to energy production has been felt here in Michigan but on a smaller scale. Earlier in 2013, Encana (a Canadian company) <a href="http://www.smartbrief.com/07/29/13/encana-targets-500-shale-wells-mich#.UrhjrNJUfz4">announced</a> that it was considering developing at least 500 new wells in the state. Current economics, however, create some <a href="http://www.crainsdetroit.com/article/20130906/BLOG010/130909902/a-good-thing-michigan-fracking-more-expensive-less-profitable-than">doubt</a> as to whether gas production in Michigan will increase more than current levels.</p>
<p>Michigan residents are paying close attention to gas and pipeline transport issues in the region because of our water resources.</p>
<p>What is the main issue in Michigan? Two words – groundwater withdrawal. Many Michigan rivers and streams are fed by groundwater. With fracking pads using up to <a href="https://www.michigan.gov/documents/deq/Hydraulic_Fracturing_In_Michigan_423431_7.pdf">20 million</a> gallons of water, the concern is fracking near waterbodies will result in reducing water levels to a point that fishing and boating will be adversely impacted. Recently, because of local opposition to oil and gas leases along the “Holy Waters” section of the AuSable River, the DNR <a href="http://www.mlive.com/news/bay-city/index.ssf/2013/12/department_of_natural_resource_2.html">designated</a> those leases as non-production leases. In addition, the sensitivity of this issue for Michigan residents has prompted the MDEQ to <a href="https://www.michigan.gov/egle/0,9429,7-135-3306_57064---,00.html">re-evaluate</a> its fracking rules.</p>
<p>Michigan residents are also concerned about oil transport through the Great Lakes region. Companies like Enbridge are building or expanding pipelines in Michigan to handle the increased production of oil elsewhere. There are also <a href="http://business.financialpost.com/2013/12/12/are-the-great-lakes-the-next-pipeline-for-alberta-crude-oil/?__lsa=e6b8-45cd">plans</a> to build an oil shipping port in Superior Wisconsin so that up to 35,000 barrels (about 1.4 million gallons) of oil from Alberta’s tar sands can be shipped to refineries around the Great Lakes.</p>
<p>As many recall, in 2010 one of Enbridge’s oil pipelines near Marshall, Michigan ruptured spilling over one million gallons (about 24,000 barrels) of diluted bitumen (“dilbit”) oil into the Kalamazoo River – a spill that Enbridge is still cleaning up. While Michigan residents understand the need for oil, they are not interested in a repeat of the Enbridge spill – especially one that would involve one of the Great Lakes.</p>
<p>Although water is abundant around the Great Lakes, it is used by many for recreational purposes in addition to industrial/commercial uses. As a result, there is significant interest and demands for it to be managed so that it can be enjoyed by the greatest number of people.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.dawdalaw.com/the-united-states-of-energy-part-2-concerns-in-michigan-and-the-great-lakes/">The United States of Energy (Part 2): Concerns in Michigan and the Great Lakes</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.dawdalaw.com">Dawda PLC</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kalamazoo River Oil Spill – Two Years Later</title>
		<link>https://www.dawdalaw.com/kalamazoo-river-oil-spill-two-years-later/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dilbit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enbridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kalamazoo River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MDEQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHMSA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dawdamann.com/?p=5148</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Two years ago this week an oil pipeline owned by Canadian-based Enbridge oil company and operated by Enbridge Energy Partners ruptured spilling more than a million gallons of “dilbit” crude oil into the Kalamazoo River near Marshall, Michigan. (“Dilbit” is short for diluted bitumen. Bitumen is a thick, sticky form of crude that must be  [...]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.dawdalaw.com/kalamazoo-river-oil-spill-two-years-later/">Kalamazoo River Oil Spill – Two Years Later</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.dawdalaw.com">Dawda PLC</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" class="alignleft" src="https://www.dawdalaw.com/enviroblog/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2012/07/IMG_2252-150x150.jpg" /><br />
Two years ago this week an oil pipeline owned by Canadian-based Enbridge oil company and operated by Enbridge Energy Partners ruptured spilling more than a million gallons of “dilbit” crude oil into the Kalamazoo River near Marshall, Michigan. (“Dilbit” is short for diluted bitumen. Bitumen is a thick, sticky form of crude that must be diluted with chemicals such as benzene to get it to flow through a pipeline.)</p>
<p>The spill was one of the largest pipeline spills in U.S. history and some estimates put Enbridge’s cleanup costs at nearly $1 billion. The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) recently issued a scathing report on the events surrounding the spill (a summary of which can be accessed <a href="http://www.ntsb.gov/news/events/2012/marshall_mi/index.html">here</a>) and the EPA hit Enbridge with a $3.7 million fine. More information about the spill and cleanup can be viewed on the EPA’s <a href="https://www.epa.gov/enbridge-spill-michigan">website</a> and Michigan Department of Environmental Quality’s <a href="https://www.michigan.gov/egle/0,9429,7-135-3313_56784---,00.html">website.</a></p>
<p>Shortly after the spill happened, Dawda joined forces with AKT Peerless and Albion College to provide a van load of supplies (detergent, Tyvek suits, bottled water, etc) to local first responders that were assisting with the capture and cleanup of oil-coated wildlife. On the drive out to delivering the supplies, a strong “diesel” odor told us we were getting close and as we pulled up next to the river you could barely breathe. A gallery of some of the photos we took of the river and part of the cleanup effort is provided below.</p>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-4">
<img decoding="async" src="https://www.dawdalaw.com/enviroblog/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2012/07/IMG_2222-160x115.jpg"/>
</div>
<div class="col-md-4">
<img decoding="async" src="https://www.dawdalaw.com/enviroblog/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2012/07/IMG_2252-160x115.jpg"/>
</div>
<div class="col-md-4">
<img decoding="async" src="https://www.dawdalaw.com/enviroblog/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2012/07/IMG_2268-160x115.jpg"/>
</div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-4">
<img decoding="async" src="https://www.dawdalaw.com/enviroblog/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2012/07/IMG_2270-160x115.jpg"/>
</div>
<div class="col-md-4">
<img decoding="async" src="https://www.dawdalaw.com/enviroblog/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2012/07/IMG_2266-160x115.jpg"/>
</div>
<div class="col-md-4">
<img decoding="async" src="https://www.dawdalaw.com/enviroblog/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2012/07/IMG_2269-160x115.jpg"/>
</div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.dawdalaw.com/kalamazoo-river-oil-spill-two-years-later/">Kalamazoo River Oil Spill – Two Years Later</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.dawdalaw.com">Dawda PLC</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
